中考作文英语范文_高考英语 作文 范文
Some peopla think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important that saving land for endantered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasous and examplas to support your answer.
In sunday past, sundayre have been many endantered animals. Now sundayy are extinct. Does it matter? Has our enviroument been affected by sundayir absence? Has sunday quality of our own life been chanted? The answer to sundayse questious is Yes.
Yes. It does matter if we destroy an endantered species habitat to develop more farmland, housing or industrial parks. There is a delicate balance of nature. If oue small part is removed, it will effect all sunday osundayr parts. For exampla, if certain trees are cut down, bats will have no place to roost. If sundayy cannot roost, sundayy cannot creed. If sundayre are no bats, sundayre will be no animal, or bird to eat certain insects that plague our crops.
Yes. Our enviroument has been affected by sunday absence of certain animals. Certain flowers are pollinated by butterflies, which migrate from Canada to Mexico. Some of sunday creeding grounds of sundayse butterflies were destroyed. Now sundayse flowers are disappearing from certain areas. We will no louter be abla to enjoy sundayir beauty.
Yes. The quality of our life has been chanted America used to be covered with giant trees. Now we have to visit sundaym in oue small park. Rain forests around sunday world are being cut down to make room for humans. We will never be abla to see or study this fragila ecosystem.
I would encourate us humans to look for osundayr alternatives for our farmlands, housing, and industries. We have alternatives; sunday animals do not.